All Things Being Unequal

Republicans argue that society is made up of job creators and moochers – contributors and extractors.  In Republican World, higher taxes punish those who are “more productive.”  Higher taxes are an unfair burden  imposed on the “producers”  by a too-powerful government which  “steals” their hard-earned cash and redistributes it to the “moochers.”

In Republican World, the word “productive” is simply code for “rich.”  Republicans and their wealthy sugar daddies equate money with hard work and virtue.  Because they earn more money, they believe they work harder and are more virtuous than those who earn less money.  They believe that anyone who needs any kind of subsidy from the government is shiftless and lazy.

The twenty-something Ivy Leaguer who sits in front of a computer screen all day, buying and selling pieces of paper, sincerely believes he works harder than a pre-school teacher who cares for 25 toddlers during the day and pours drinks for arrogant MBAs at her second job tending bar at night.  Or than the guy who picks strawberries for ten hours a day in the blazing sun.  Or the nurse who empties his bedpan should he ever be so unfortunate as to become sick.

In Republican World, the waitress who works 40 hours a week for minimum wage and no health benefits is a moocher because she needs subsidized child care.  The janitor who works for thirty years, gets cancer, loses his job and then his health insurance is a moocher when he’s forced to resort to Medicaid.  The assembly-line worker who makes one 500th of what the CEO earns and is lucky enough to have good health benefits and a pension plan is a moocher because he’s taking money out of stockholders’ pockets.

Taking the Republican argument at face value, moochers are people who extract more value than they contribute.  So when a corporate executive fails, destroys jobs and stockholder value and is rewarded with a golden parachute – what does that make him?  A producer or a moocher?

Those who got laid off because of the Head Moocher’s – I mean Producer’s – incompetence are rewarded with unemployment benefits averaging $295 per week.  An amount so “generous” in the eyes of the “Producers” that it is a disincentive to work.  With all these disincentives – it’s a miracle that anyone works!

Republicans see themselves as clear-eyed pragmatists and Democrats as dreamy idealists who just don’t understand  the real world.  Yet it is Republicans who call climate change a hoax and evolution an unproven “theory.”   It is Republicans who insist that universal healthcare deprives us of our freedom while indiscriminate strip searches do not.    It is Republicans who, in spite of thirty years of evidence to the contrary, insist that giving more to the rich – in the form of lower taxes – helps  the poor.

Republicans love the myth of the self-made man because it helps justify their unwillingness to contribute to the well being of society as a whole. In their fantasy world, all children are born with equal opportunities and if everyone doesn’t become a successful hedge fund manager – well – it’s because they didn’t have a strong enough work ethic.

“For everyone to whom much is given, of him shall much be required.” Luke 12:48

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Run Stephen Run!

Stephen Colbert should run for President as the Republican Party candidate. Just think, if he won the nomination, we’d still have a Democrat and a Republican in the race!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Reason has Left the Building

Ron Paul admirers complain that he doesn’t get enough respect or attention from the media. I agree with the attention part. Unfortunately too many people admire Paul because he “sticks to his guns” even if the gun is pointed at our collective heads. Sane people call that suicide.

Some Democrats like Paul because he’s against the wars and wants to cut military spending. This is the political equivalent of putting a group of monkeys in a room with a typewriter. When someone is against government in all its manifestations, eventually you’re bound to find something you can agree on. That doesn’t mean the man isn’t a lunatic. Or that the novel the monkeys eventually write is readable.

Some Democrats liked John McCain because, in the years before he became a presidential candidate, he wasn’t afraid to vote contrary to the party line. That didn’t make him moderate; it just indicated that he was, in his own words, a maverick. Others might say he was simply contrary.

We shouldn’t be voting for personality traits. We’re not electing a prom king or queen. “Likeability” – the trait that George W. Bush had in spades – is important in a brother-in-law, but it’s not top of the list of what one looks for in the leader of the free world. I can forgive the President of the United States if he has a prickly side. In fact, I’d welcome another LBJ about now. We should be voting for leadership qualities such as intelligence, thoughtfulness and shared values as demonstrated by a candidate’s past behavior and the ability to act in the best interests of the country as a whole.

That’s what makes it hard for Republicans. Of their two top candidates, one has no core values and the other has values straight out of Dickens. Even his name, Newt Gingrich, sounds Dickensian. Or is it Seussian? Who can forget Mr. Murdstone? Or the Grinch?

The only reasonable Republican candidate, Jon Huntsman, just can’t get a date to the dance. In the Republicans’ house, reason has left the room and along with it, the ability to be reasonable. Republicans aren’t the loyal opposition – they’re just the opposition. In my book – one that wasn’t written by monkeys – that makes them unqualified to govern.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Millionaires on Food Stamps?

A December 12 article in the New York Times noted that Republicans, in their latest take on the Cadillac-driving Welfare Queen theme, are working to make sure that unemployed millionaires aren’t allowed to collect unemployment benefits or food stamps.

Every lottery-playing chump knows a million dollars isn’t what it used to be back in the day when the fictional John Beresford Tipton pulled up to the curb and delivered a check in that amount to some deserving individual.

In the world that isn’t trapped in the fifties, you could easily be a “millionaire” if you’ve paid off your mortgage and been saving for retirement for thirty years. But if you lose your job, what are you supposed to eat? Bricks and Mortar?

No bank is going to refinance your mortgage and fork over equity if you don’t have income. That leaves you the option of selling the house in a terrible housing market or dipping into your retirement account and paying the penalties.

Having a million dollars in assets – retirement accounts, your home, your wedding ring and all your worldly goods — doesn’t put you in the top 1%. Far from it. This is just the latest ploy by Republicans to try to appear fair and balanced. They’re not.

They’d rather see you on the street than pay you the unemployment benefits that you and your employer have paid for.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

“White Man Speak With Forked Tongue” – Tonto

More proof that Republican hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Refusing to approve President Obama’s nomination of Caitlin Halligan to be a federal appeals court judge, the New York Times reported this week that Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, led the Republican Party’s opposition saying “Ms. Halligan’s record demonstrated that she viewed the court as a means of advancing a social agenda instead of as a forum for even-handedly deciding legal questions.”

“We shouldn’t be putting activists on the bench,” Mr. McConnell said. “I think she would use the court to put her activist judicial philosophy into practices, and for that reason alone she shouldn’t be confirmed.”

After all, Republicans never do that. Except when they want to anoint a President (see Bush v. Gore) or declare corporations to be “persons” who can make unlimited political contributions (Citizens United), or deprive a woman of the right to control her own body (stay tuned), or decide who can marry…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Parsing Chancellor Birgeneau

So here’s my take on Cal Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau’s incredibly lame email to the “extended Berkeley Community” explaining the police brutality that took place on the campus where the free speech movement was born.  His words are in quotes.

“We regret that, in spite of forewarnings, we encountered a situation where, to uphold our policy, we were required to forcibly remove tents and arrest people.”

Translation:  You made us do it.  It’s your fault.  And policy is always more important than people.

“It is unfortunate that some protesters chose to obstruct the police by linking arms and forming a human chain to prevent the police from gaining access to the tents.  This is not non-violent civil disobedience. “

Translation:  Linking arms is violent.  (Who knew?)

“By contrast, some of the protesters chose to be arrested peacefully; they were told to leave their tents, informed that they would be arrested if they did not, and indicated their intention to be arrested.  They did not resist arrest or try physically to obstruct the police officers’ efforts to remove the tent.  These protesters were acting in the tradition of peaceful civil disobedience, and we honor them.”

Translation:  A pat on the head to the good little boys and girls who followed directions.

Note to Chancellor Birgeneau: The key word in the phrase “civil disobedience” is “disobedience”  meaning the opposite of obedience.  Protestors who refused to leave their tents are no less legitimate than those who agreed.  (Forgive the double negative.  Just following the chancellor’s lead.)

“We regret that, given the instruction to take down tents and prevent encampment, the police were forced to use their batons to enforce the policy.  We regret all injuries, to protesters and police, that resulted from this effort.  The campus’s Police Review Board will ultimately determine whether police used excessive force under the circumstances.”

Translation:  Again, your fault.  And we really, really regret that everyone who owns a smart phone has a video camera in his or her pocket.  But don’t worry, we’ll leave it up to the police to decide if they misbehaved and we all know the police never do anything bad … unless they’re forced to.

“We call on the protesters to observe campus policy or, if they choose to defy the policy, to engage in truly non-violent civil disobedience and to accept the consequences of their decisions.”

Translation:  Don’t come whining to us if you get your ribs broken or your hair pulled.

“We ask supporters of the Occupy movement to consider the interests of the broader community—the tens of thousands who elected not to participate in yesterday’s events. We urge you to consider the fact that there are so many time-tested ways to have your voices heard without violating the one condition we have asked you to abide by.”

Translation:  The tens of thousands who were working at their crappy minimum-wage jobs and were thus unable to join you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Best Definitions of a Corporation

The most quotable words I’ve heard this week come from Stephen Colbert and Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor.

Secretary Reich: “I will believe that corporations are people when Georgia and Texas execute them.”

Stephen Colbert: “[Corporations are] Born in a lawyer’s office, exist only on paper, have no soul and can never die.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment