WARNING! Do not iron clothes while wearing!

Hitler was a: a) Communist b) Socialist c) Democrat d) Fascist e) What's the Difference?

My dad had a saying about people with no common sense:  “They must have been behind the door when the brains were handed out.”   And then there was Voltaire who said, “Common sense is not so common.”

According to Republicans, there are two problems in our country and two problems only: taxes and over-regulation.  In the Republican’s new playbook, all wealthy people are “job creators,” and if lower taxes have not yet created those elusive jobs, well – it’s because we haven’t lowered taxes enough!  We don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem!

Over-regulation hurts small businesses, they say.  Since when did Republicans care about anything small?  I once attended an event in Washington, D.C. where Vice President Dick Cheney asserted that the biggest problem facing small business was tort reform.  A year later, it was Social Security.  Even the head of the U.S. Small Business Administration admitted that it might be a stretch to believe that.  He didn’t last long.  You may have noticed that in the Republican Party, it’s the party line or no party.

Most small businesses are relatively un-impacted by regulations that, for instance, prevent them from dumping toxic pollutants into the air or water – things that result in frogs with two heads and fish that glow in the dark.  For the most part, those would be your big businesses.  Remember when the Detroit River and Lake Erie caught fire?  Do you think those events were caused by the corner grocery store, your local book seller or your Uncle Tony’s barbershop?

Even I can admit that the warning labels on some products seem ludicrous.   Should anyone be surprised that lighting a tube of tobacco leaves and inhaling the smoke directly into your lungs might be hazardous to your health?  But at the risk of sounding unsympathetic, people who need to be told not to iron their clothes while wearing them or to avoid using a hair dryer while bathing, might do us all a favor by nominating themselves for a Darwin award.

But the labels and regulations are there for a reason.  They are there primarily to protect us.  Do you really want to buy meat with no “sell by” date on it? To work 12-hour days, seven days a week with no paid sick or vacation days?  To lose your home because you didn’t read or understand all twenty pages of six-point type?  To see your child die of leukemia because of the toxic chemicals he ingests every time he swallows a drink of tap water?   Sometimes the labels even protect manufacturers from idiots who don’t have enough sense to figure out that standing on the top rung of a ladder might be a trifle unstable.

When things go wrong, we want to blame someone else and we sue them for damages.  Sometimes people are negligent and deserve to be sued.  Sometimes stuff happens and that’s life.   Frivolous lawsuits are costly to society and to businesses, but all lawsuits are not frivolous.  Lawsuits, at their best, hold wrongdoers accountable and right an injustice.  But, if you haven’t figured it out yet, justice is not high on the Republican priority list.

Republicans like to describe a society that takes care of the needs of its people in derogatory terms like “the nanny state,” or a “welfare state.”   While proclaiming their devout Christianity, they promote a clearly un-Christian society based on “every man for himself.”

Yet people who depend on Social Security and Medicare, who pitch their tents in Yellowstone and Yosemite and who send their children to public school continue to vote for these charlatans.  Were they behind the door when the brains were handed out?  Or did they go to schools where the school boards have rewritten history, inserted “intelligent design” into the science curriculum and dropped requirements for all students to study civics?

We’ve obviously gone wrong someplace when people don’t know the difference between fascism, communism and socialism and when they continue to believe the President of the United States was born in Kenya despite conclusive evidence to the contrary.

“Every man for himself” does not create a civilized society – it creates chaos, anarchy and inequality.  It creates a society in which no one is held accountable for their actions – thus the Republican passion for tort reform.  Their motto should be “Don’t blame me.”  Or even more appropriately,  caveat emptor – buyer beware.  A motto to keep in mind next time you enter the voting booth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Hoppin’ Down the Bunny Trail

Two future Secretaries of State with their mentor.

Oh boy, finally a feminist TV show coming to an NBC station near you.  At least that’s how Hugh Hefner spins it.  The Playboy Club, a new show airing this fall, is set in Chicago in the sixties. According to a recent interview with Hef, (Does the man ever get out of his pajamas?) the Playboy Clubs “empowered women and started the sexual revolution.”

How could I have been so wrong?  I thought women were empowered by legislation that gave us the vote, prohibited gender and race-based discrimination and  provided access to equal education and opportunity, to wit: The Nineteenth Amendment , the Civil Rights Act and Title IX.

And how could I have been so deluded as to believe that the sexual revolution was due primarily to the widespread availability of safe and easy contraception – The Pill – when all along, it was really the Playboy Club?  Give the man the Congressional Medal of Freedom!

Asserting that Playboy Clubs empowered women is tantamount to crediting Seagram’s with the  founding of AA and MADD.  Playboy Clubs allowed women to be exploited by a better-groomed class of gropers in a more exclusive environment.  Period.

Wearing a push-up bra and a fluffy tail on your ass may have been marginally better than humping the pole at your local Girls! Girls! Girls! exotic dance club but don’t kid yourself that being a Playboy Bunny was the equivalent of being, say, Secretary of State.

The idea that Hugh Hefner, with the umpteenth Jessica Rabbit on his arm, is in any way responsible for women’s empowerment is as ludicrous as Donald Trump aspiring to the Oval Office.  And NBC has them both!  How lucky can one network get?

NBC is banking on capturing Mad Men’s audience.  Will Playboy Club, like Mad Men, honestly depict the dearth of choices for women in the sixties?  Or will it simply provide a vehicle for more T and A than network viewers have ever seen?  Call me a cynic, but I expect the audience to be heavily skewed with male viewers looking for a little titillation and sighing with nostalgia for the good old days.

Me?  I’ll be looking for a show where women own the clubs and men are changing diapers.  That’s what I call a sexual revolution.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

I Have a Nightmare

Hoover's American Dream

Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.  It’s a well-known quote to everyone except Republicans.  According to the New York Times, recent economic data indicating that the recovery is slowing has “emboldened” Republican legislators to demand even deeper cuts.

The economy isn’t recovering so what do Republicans want to do?  Sharpen their hatchets.  Cut spending, cut regulations, cut social programs and their favorite – cut taxes.  It’s the only thing they know how to do.   Oh, and blame it on the Democrats.

Thirty years on the Reagan Deregulation Express led to the banking and investment debacle that created the worldwide depression.  Yes, depression.  Open your eyes,  get your fingers out of your ears and stop singing la-la-la at the top of your lungs.  It’s not a recession – great or otherwise – it’s a depression.

Ten years of Republican tax cutting and Democratic enabling has not trickled down or created jobs.   Those tax cuts have gushed, not trickled, into the pockets of the wealthiest 1%.  While the rich are snapping up real estate bargains, the rest of us are planting vegetable gardens and selling our family heirlooms on E-Bay.

“Government doesn’t create jobs,” Speaker of the House John Boehner declares.  And he’s right. Government, under Republican leadership, destroys jobs. Thanks to Boehner and his know-nothing cohorts, 1.1 million government workers have lost their jobs.  And don’t fool yourself that they’re paper-pushing bureaucrats; they’re primarily teachers, firefighters and police officers.

Republicans live in a black and white world where private enterprise is always good – even when it’s Enron – and government is always bad – even when it’s improving the health, education and welfare of its citizens.  But Dubya and his MBA portfolio of tricks did not increase prosperity or improve American’s quality of life.

Under Dubya’s expert leadership,  intelligence on terrorist activities was ignored leading to 9/11, a subsequent recession and two bankrupting wars (that were supposed to be paid for with Iraq’s oil).  Deregulation and lax oversight led to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, an $85 billion bailout of AIG and a $900 billion bailout (TARP) of the nation’s biggest banks to prevent them from collapsing. (Who was it who said the easiest way to rob a bank is to own one?)  And don’t forget the depression.    In the last year of the Bush Administration, the economy lost 2.6 million jobs, 1.9 million in the last four months alone – the worst jobs loss in over sixty years.

Republicans say fewer regulations and lower taxes will give businesses – “job creators” – the confidence to hire.  This is patent nonsense.  Businesses hire for one reason only: increased demand.   But with over 13 million jobless, nearly as many underemployed in part-time jobs and everyone else afraid they’re going to lose their jobs, demand is and will remain weak.  Since 2009, the private sector has created only about 1 million jobs.

In 1928, Herbert Hoover (need I say he was a Republican?) promised that his austerity measures would lead to “A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage.”  Instead, it led to “Hoovervilles, ”  shanty towns housing thousands of homeless.

Republicans are leading us down that same garden path again.   If we follow them, we might as well start printing the bumper stickers:

Don’t have a pot to piss in – Car’s been repossessed – What garage?

The American Dream is officially over.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Along Came Sarah

"I'm not a deep thinker."

When I was a child, I loved watching Shirley Temple movies.  So much more fun to watch the curly-topped child tap dance her way through life than the alternate fare: war movies.  Women rarely appeared in war movies – just men chomping cigars and blowing things up.

Ever since I became old enough to vote, I’ve longed to cast my ballot for a female presidential candidate.  In my lifetime, I want to experience the sense of arrival that was so clear on the faces of African American voters on the night that Barack Obama was elected.

I thought I might get the chance with Hillary Clinton, but it was not to be.  I might even have voted for Elizabeth Dole, because back when, Republican women actually proposed more women-child-family friendly legislation than Democratic men.

And then, along came the Republican Sisty Uglers: Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.

Sarah Palin, the barracuda-woman who could dress down a deer,  “reads everything ” but couldn’t name a single newspaper, journal, or book and who purported to understand foreign policy because she could see Russia from her front porch.  Who never stopped to consider whether she might actually be qualified to be Vice President of the United States – a heartbeat away from the presidency – before accepting John McCain’s invitation to be his running mate.  I blame him for all this.  After all, he was just looking for a cute babe on the ticket to capture the votes of those who make decisions with something other than their brain.

Sarah whetted our appetite for more shoot-from-the-hip, mean girl politicians who could prove they’re just as nasty as their male colleagues.  Into the breach stepped  Michelle Bachmann – the “thinking man’s” Sarah Palin – a  pro-gun, anti-abortion religious fundamentalist who believes that climate change is a hoax and gay marriage will cause school children to become homosexual.  A fan of Joseph McCarthy, she’d like to “take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out: Are they pro-America or anti-America?”  Would you entrust the Bill of Rights to this woman?

Michelle said: “I just take the Bible for what it is, I guess, and recognize that I am not a scientist, not trained to be a scientist. I’m not a deep thinker on all of this. I wish I was.  I wish I was more knowledgeable, but I’m not a scientist.”  That acknowledgement didn’t prevent her from declaring that “there are no studies proving that carbon dioxide gas is harmful” and that, “There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel Prizes, who believe in intelligent design.”

The  truest  thing she’s ever uttered is that she’s not a deep thinker.

Now, as everyone waits with baited breath to see whether Sarah and Michelle will throw their Brunhilde hats into the Presidential ring, all I can say is: They’re not the ones I’ve been waiting for.  If Sarah and Michelle have proved anything, it’s that women have achieved an unprecedented level of equality:  they can be as mediocre as men and still be successful.  They can also blow things up.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Heads We Win Tails You Lose

Senator Mitch McConnell (R - Kentucky) - Defender of the poor, the sick and the disenfranchised.

Last week Senate Republicans voted down a bill that would eliminate approximately $2 Billion per year in tax breaks for big oil. (Chump change for the five biggest oil companies that reaped $35 billion in profits in the first quarter alone.)

In defending their actions, the Republican Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell, tireless defender of the poor, the sick and the disenfranchised, said that eliminating the breaks would not translate to lower prices at the pump.

Whaaa?  I thought it was about reducing the deficit.

Where’s the concern about the cost to people “at the pump” when it comes to health care,  education, housing?  Republican policy prohibits Medicare from negotiating prices with big pharma and results in markedly higher prescription costs for seniors at the healthcare “pump.”

Republicans were against the Obama administration’s bill eliminating the middle man – banks – in issuing student loans even though that action saved $68 billion, is projected to create 820,000 more Pell grants over the next decade and will make payments more affordable.  Now Republicans want to cut Pell grants, job training, small business development services – you name it – all in the name of cutting the deficit.

Who do those cuts hurt?  The ones filling up with four-dollar gas so they can get to the next job fair before their unemployment benefits run out.  (Republicans also don’t like imposing fuel efficiency standards on automobiles.)

McConnell and his hypocritical Republican colleagues only pretend to be concerned for the peoples’ welfare;  if you believe them, that bridge in Brooklyn is still available.  The only welfare Republicans are concerned about is corporate welfare.

In the same week that Senate Republicans presented their gift to the oil industry, McConnell said we have to keep cutting the budget so “the markets will have more confidence.” He’s obviously not talking about your corner market — the one that closed before they got the memo that the recession is “over.” Expect to get that memo by pony express — after they shut down the post office.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Bitches Are Coming! The Bitches Are Coming!

"The Bitches are Coming!"

Who will lead the next American revolution?  Will it be cell phone-wielding youth, calling their Facebook friends to arms?   As their college tuition bills grow and their job prospects shrink, there should be more than enough fuel to light that fire.  Or maybe it will be their high school buddies who decided to “Be all they could be,” but came back home with traumatic brain injuries, PTSD or absent a limb or two.

Compulsory military service in a pointless war politicized my generation.  But with no draft, I don’t expect to see a revival of the popular bumper sticker, Question Authority, any time soon.    Instead of worrying about being killed in an inhospitable desert far from home, the young dream of making a killing on Wall Street.

Perhaps the revolution will be led by card-carrying union members – you know – those radical socialists who teach our children, issue our marriage licenses, put out fires and keep our streets safe.  Don’t you just love how that phrase – card-carrying – sounds so subversive when you apply it to people who belong to the ACLU or a trade union?  How come it doesn’t have the same bite when I call someone a “Platinum American Express Card-carrying Republican?”

Maybe the Boomers will comb some Grecian Formula through their hair and get up off the couch when the Republicans take away their Medicare and Social Security.  Lots of Boomers are under 55.  They won’t benefit from the GOP’s transparent attempt to avoid a senior voter revolt by promising that nothing will change if you’re 55 or older.

In my fantasy, the next revolution will be testosterone-free.   The Republicans will go too far, as they always do, in interpreting their “mandate.”  They’ll cut Planned Parenthood and Women’s Business Centers and the Women/Infant/Child (WIC) nutrition program.  They’ll keep hacking away at collective bargaining rights for public service workers and teachers (mainly women).   The Supreme Court will throw out a few more pay discrimination cases like Lily Leadbetter and the Walmart class action lawsuit.

And one day, women who are tired of making 78 cents on the male dollar, tired of doing the majority of the child care and housework, tired of seeing their children killed in senseless wars and their tax dollars  spent on corporate welfare instead of better schools will say enough!  The crones and bitches (among whom I proudly count myself) who have lived long enough to recognize that being well-behaved gets you nowhere, will  drop their toilet brushes and raise their voices and say: Enough!

And perhaps a young man named Paul will take out his smart phone and tweet:  The Bitches are Coming! The Bitches are Coming!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Don’t Look Behind the Curtain

Republican policy can crash more than the stock market.

I miss Tricky Dick – Nixon – not Cheney. Nixon was the last Republican President to reduce the national debt as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP: the total market value of goods and services produced by a country).

Yup, there hasn’t been a Republican President in nearly 40 years who has reduced our debt yet the GOP still manages to snooker voters into believing they’re the party of fiscal prudence. Tricky Dick might have been a crook, but at least he came by it honestly: he was a REAL Republican. The national debt has fallen under every single Democratic Administration since FDR.

The biggest deficit in modern history was immediately after WWII: 117.5% of GDP. Between 1945 and 1953, the Roosevelt and Truman Administrations reduced the debt by 46%. Eisenhower reduced it by another 16% and Nixon reduced it by 3%. How did they do it? They increased revenues. How? Through a combination of taxes and growth. Under Eisenhower and Nixon, top tax rates were 91% and 70% respectively. So did all the high earners lose their will to work and quit their jobs? Not that anyone noticed.

If you’ve been listening to the Republicans, you might not realize that increasing revenues is actually an option for reducing debt. You might think the only way to reduce our debt is to cut programs for the poor, the sick and the elderly.

The other Tricky Dick – Cheney – famously said “Deficits don’t matter.” What he meant was, Deficits don’t matter under a Republican Administration.

Under Ronnie Ray-Guns, national debt increased by 20.6%, under Bush #1 it went up 15% and under Junior Bush, it went up 27.1%. By the time Barack Obama took over, the national debt was 83.4% of GDP. At the end of the Carter Administration it was 32.5%.

So do deficits matter or not? Politicians love to talk about “living within our means” because it sounds so darn responsible. They especially love comparing the federal budget with your family budget. But here’s a little-known truth about capitalism: it requires capital. Leveraging capital creates growth. Sitting on it causes stagnation.

But let’s go with the family budget analogy. Say you earn $50,000 a year and you buy a home for $150,000. If you made a 20% down payment you would have a $120,000 mortgage. If you had no other debt – no car payments, no credit card debt, no student loans – your household Debt to GDP would be 240%. Is that a bad thing? Of course not. You’re investing in the future of your family. If you had to pay cash for your house, hardly anyone would own one. Over the years, if all goes well, you’ll earn more and your mortgage balance will decline. If you hit a bad patch – get sick, lose your job – you might need to borrow some money to tide you over until things get better. The government is doing the same thing you’d do.

The Federal Government is responsible for investing in and caring for our national family: all of us. That means fixing Grandma’s cataracts and bridges over the Mississippi River. It means paying Uncle John the war veteran’s disability and maintaining dependable public transportation so Aunt Sue can get to work. It means providing Johnny and Suzie with a decent education and air they can breathe. Is health, welfare, safety and educational opportunity worth investing in?

If you’re a Republican, the answer is no.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hostage Crisis #2 and Counting…

So this is how it’s going to be. The Know-Nothing Crackpot Guido Party is going to extort budget cuts in exchange for their votes on any significant issue that comes before Congress. Next showdown: raising the debt ceiling.

Every sane economist on the face of the planet agrees that NOT raising the debt ceiling could be catastrophic. The threat of defaulting on our sovereign debt would cause interest rates to spike and slam the door on a feeble economic recovery that has yet to make a significant dent in the unemployment rate.

13.5 million people are still out of work, losing their homes and their life savings. Yet Republicans are willing to play a dangerous game of chicken in order to perpetuate the myth that they are fiscally prudent and responsible.

They say that raising taxes on people earning more than $250,000 per year will hurt job creation because “half of those people are small business owners.”

Only 3% of small business owners earn more than $250,000, moreover, a large proportion of that 3% are independent agents like professional actors, athletes and high-paid consultants who are not creating jobs. But the Know-Nothing Party keeps saying these things to make us believe they’re pro-business. They aren’t – unless you’re a BIG business, which, coincidentally, makes lots of campaign contributions.

The current Republican Congress tried to cut community development financial institutions – the local non-profit organizations who make loans to small businesses that can’t get bank loans – by 80%. Those same small businesses that are creating virtually all the net new jobs and, coincidentally, AREN’T making lots of campaign contributions.

Does our debt need to be reduced? Eventually, yes. But not tomorrow. Give the Main Street Economy, not just Wall Street, a chance to recover.

Historically – after World War II for example – debt was paid down through a combination of economic growth and higher taxes. Republicans refuse to raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires and want to bankrupt middle- and low-income Americans by decimating Medicare, Social Security and any other social program, including Pell grants for college students, that might actually help average people prosper.

Their policies will lead only to more income inequality and greater misery. They’re playing a dangerous game. Be prepared to be roadkill.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Social Insecurity

Chicken Little is everywhere these days, warning us that the Social Security sky is falling. Republicans like to call SS an “entitlement program” that’s contributing to the federal deficit. It isn’t. It’s a self-funded annuity program. You put money in over your working lifetime and you’re guaranteed a monthly payment as long as you live.

We’re now being told that those payments are unsustainable. How can that be? For decades, the Social Security Trust Fund ran huge surpluses. In 1940 there were 42 workers for every retiree. In 1950, there were 16. There was way more money going in than being paid out.

Remember how Al Gore was ridiculed when he talked about the Social Security “Lockbox?” He was ridiculed because there was no lockbox. There was a cookie jar.

Think of the surpluses as cookies. The greedy children in Congress couldn’t stand all those cookies just sitting there in the cookie jar, so they ate the cookies and left IOUs in their place. Now, the cookies are all gone and Congress has to pay back the IOUs. That is the only way that Social Security contributes to the deficit.

Today, there are 3.3 workers per retiree, and within 40 years, it’s projected that there will be just two workers per retiree. In other words, the pyramid scheme will collapse. Obviously, something will have to change. The question is what and when? Here are some of the solutions being discussed:

Means Testing: Warren Buffet is not waiting for his social security check to arrive so that he can afford to buy his Lipitor, but he gets the maximum benefit, currently around $2,000 per month. The more you earn during your lifetime, the bigger your benefit, and vice versa. So, the people who need the most – low-wage workers – get the least. Means testing is supposed to save money by lowering benefits for more affluent retirees. What worries me about means testing is who defines the parameters of need? If it’s a Republican, expect to be eating more dog food.

Raise the retirement age: If you were born after 1938, this has already been done. Full retirement benefits aren’t available until you’re 66 or 67. Given the increase in life expectancy since 1935, I don’t think this is an unreasonable suggestion except for people who do strenuous physical work or are disabled by deteriorating mental capacity. But here’s why it may not be a good idea: jobs. If globalization and automation continue to decrease job availability, older people will need to retire in order for younger workers to find jobs.

Eliminating or raising the earnings cap: Currently, working people and their employers each pay 6.2% Social Security taxes on the first $106,800 you earn in wages. The maximum SS tax anyone pays is $6,622. If you make less than the cap, you pay the maximum 6.2%. The more you earn above the cap, the smaller the percentage of your wages it represents. (Which makes it a regressive tax.) If you’re an average Wall Streeter earning $340,000, your SS taxes amount to less than 2% of your income.

By far the easiest way to erase the SS gap would be to raise the wage cap but hardly anybody ever talks about that. Can you guess why? Companies with lots of high-paid workers – Goldman Sachs for example – would have to pay higher payroll taxes. If ever there was an entitlement program crying out for reform, it’s corporate welfare.

Privatizing: This was a non-starter under the Bush Administration and for good reason. Those of us who are lucky enough to have retirement accounts understand that we save today for tomorrow’s needs and with any luck, our savings will grow enough to fulfill those needs. Unfortunately, luck hasn’t been with us lately. If you’re retired or near retirement, the stock market meltdown took a big bite out of your savings that you may never recover.

Say you had $100,000 in your retirement account and it lost 40% ($40,000) in 2008, but gained 40% in 2009. You did not regain your lost $40,000, you regained $24,000, which is 40% of the $60,000 that was left in your account. If you were already retired and taking money out instead of putting it in, you’re royally screwed. If you were close to retirement, you lost at least three years of earnings when your savings should have been multiplying the fastest.

The Wall Street geniuses are being rewarded with big bonuses again because the market is back above 12,000, (2,000 points less than its peak) but you’re not even back to even. Do we really want to give Wall Street our Social Security money to play with?

Question #2: When should we fix it?
The office of management and budget predicts that Social Security, with no changes at all, will be solvent for another 25 years. Not that I advocate procrastinating, but here’s my fear: If we put more cookies in the jar, what will prevent Congress from stealing them?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Vive la Difference

April 11, 2011: Today, France began enforcing its law prohibiting women from wearing full-face veils in public.

This is not an easy issue. While many Muslim women undoubtedly wear the veil because of family, social and religious pressure, others choose it of their own free will. I’ve worked in a Middle East country and met women who were educated in the West and had dressed both in the Western and in the traditional Muslim fashion.

One woman told me that she chose to wear the traditional hijab (the head scarf but not the full veil) because she received less unwanted sexual attention when she did. Her comment speaks to far greater issues with regard to how women are treated in the Muslim world. But this is an issue of religious freedom as well as personal choice.

Until not that long ago, Catholic nuns dressed almost identically to Muslim women in medieval black habits. They completely covered their hair, although not their faces. When nuns changed their attire, it was because they wanted to. They became activists on their own behalf. There was no outcry from either the secular or non-Catholic community about their dress.

In the more moderate Muslim countries, the hijab, worn with a long coat, is much more common than the full abaya and veil and many women have forsworn traditional garb altogether.

Although I cringe when I see fully veiled women, and see it as a mark of oppression, I don’t believe I have the right to impose my own beliefs or dictate how they should dress. Nor does France. This is a decision that Muslim women must make for themselves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment